Legal Opinion
Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. v. Horten
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 19, 1997No. 96 Civil 1895 (LBS)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
Plaintiff Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. (“Orix”) sues to enforce a guaranty arising from an equipment lease. Plaintiff now moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, and instead grant summary judgment in favor of Defendants.
I
BACKGROUND
The following statement of facts is taken from Orix’s complaint and from the decision of the California Court of Appeal in U.S Roofing, Inc. v. Credit Alliance Corp., 228 Cal.App.3d 1431, 279 Cal.Rptr. 533 (1991), a prior…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Skyline Steel, LLC v. PilePro, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Bridgeway Corp. v. CitibankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Rodriguez v. Atria Senior Living Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Jacques v. DiMarzio, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Goldman v. Breitbart News Network, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.