Legal Opinion
Crescent Women's Medical Group, Inc. v. Keycorp
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County
Decided April 4, 2003No. A-01-06592PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas H. CRUSH, Judge.
{¶ 1} This matter is before the court upon motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of defendant.
{¶ 2} In January 1977, Mary Kurtz was hired as executive director of Crescent Women’s Medical Group, Inc., with authority to fill out, sign, and issue checks on behalf of Crescent. From August 1999 to March 2001, Kurtz and Mary Suhr, a subordinate employee, used ATM machines to deposit to their own accounts 40 Crescent checks made payable to various corporate Crescent creditors. All of the checks were unendorsed, six of them having the words “for deposit only” written on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Perez v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Killilea v. Sears, Roebuck Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hinkle v. Cornwell Quality Tool Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Parent Teacher Ass'n v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fernando Tatis v. Us BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Levy Baldante Finney & Rubenstein v. Wells FargoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Tatis v. US BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007