Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bradford v. Ress

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1958No. 34414Published

1DissentSimmons, C. J.

The court is concerned with the “summary enforcement” of the statutes by the director. That is not the question presented here.

Here we are concerned with the rights of a licensed driver, their extent under the statutes, and their protection in the courts of this state after the summary proceedings before the director have been exercised. We begin here where the summary proceedings end.

The proceedings before the director are summary. They are ex parte, no witnesses are called, no hearing had, and no opportunity given to the driver to present his contentions. The order of the director becomes…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Commonwealth v. ColeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Deshler Broom Factory v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Commonwealth v. HerzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. A. Borchman Sons v. CarpenterNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API