Legal Opinion
Holler v. Cinemark USA, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 4, 2002No. 2:01-cv-02528PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
James Bryan Holler brings suit against Cinemark USA, Inc. (“Cinemark”) for negligence (Count I) and negligence per se (Count II). Cinemark moves to dismiss Count II pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R.Civ.P. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss (Doc. # 4) filed November 13, 2001. For reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is sustained.
Legal Standards
A Rule 12(b)(6) motion should not be granted unless “it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Gff Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Shaw v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Welch v. LoftusDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2011
- ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. v. SwensonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Kremer v. Scannell Properties 516, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- Laporsek v. BurressDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019
- McCarthy v. WeathervaneDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.