Legal Opinion

State v. Patel

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 14, 2017No. SC 160420PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

**932Article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have a right ... to be released on bail upon sufficient security, except in capital offenses, *1038where the proof is evident or the presumption great ...." The principal issue before this court is whether the constitutional right to bail is extinguished when a defendant has been found guilty of a criminal offense or whether it continues until the defendant has been sentenced for that offense.

The defendant, Hiral Patel, was released pretrial on a $1 million bond, which the…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PurcellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  2. Kuchta v. ArisianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. State v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
  4. State v. McFarland (Third Concurrence)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
  5. State v. PurcellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API