Legal Opinion
Amsterdam v. Goldstick
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided September 3, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*832OPINION OF THE COURT
Lewis R. Friedman, J.
This case was initiated by pro se tenants to obtain correction of the violations at the premises and to seek the imposition of civil penalties. After a trial on the injunction questions, the court issued an order requiring the violations referred to in the petition to be removed and determined that Mark Green-berg was not qualified to serve as managing agent. (Amsterdam v Goldstick, 128 Misc 2d 374, rearg granted and original determination adhered to 131 Misc 2d 131.) During the subsequent trial of the civil penalties issues, a stipulation of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Various Tenants of 515 East 12th Street v. 515 East 12th Street Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985
- Rosenthal v. HelferCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987
- Amsterdam v. GoldstickCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985
- Heimann v. American Express Co.New York Supreme Court · 1967
- Housing & Development Administration v. Bryant Westchester Realty Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shapiro v. Townan Realty Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1994
- D'Agostino v. Forty-Three East Equities Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2006