Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re A.L.T.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 2015No. COA14–1121Published

1DissentTyson, Judge

The trial court's findings of fact are not supported by clear, cogent and convincing evidence and are insufficient to support the court's adjudication and conclusion that A.L.T. ("Anna") and C.T. ("Clara") were neglected juveniles by both parents under N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7B-101(15) (2013) or controlling precedents. I respectfully dissent from the majority's opinion and would rule the trial court erred when it adjudicated the juveniles to be neglected.

I. Standard of Review

As stated in the majority's opinion, our standard of review is "whether the trial court's findings of fact are based upon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Matter of BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. Al-BayyinahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Matter of HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  5. In Re StumboSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API