In re A.L.T.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentTyson, Judge
The trial court's findings of fact are not supported by clear, cogent and convincing evidence and are insufficient to support the court's adjudication and conclusion that A.L.T. ("Anna") and C.T. ("Clara") were neglected juveniles by both parents under N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7B-101(15) (2013) or controlling precedents. I respectfully dissent from the majority's opinion and would rule the trial court erred when it adjudicated the juveniles to be neglected.
I. Standard of Review
As stated in the majority's opinion, our standard of review is "whether the trial court's findings of fact are based upon…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Matter of BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. Al-BayyinahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Matter of HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- In Re StumboSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.