Legal Opinion
Rountree v. CHING FENG BLINDS INDUSTRY CO. LTD.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided June 10, 2008No. 3:04-cr-00112PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER FROM CHAMBERS
[Re: Motion at Docket 157]
JOHN W. SEDWICK, District Judge.
I. MOTION PRESENTED
At docket 157, defendant Window Covering Manufacturers Association (“WCMA”) moves for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Valerie Rountree, on behalf of the Estate of April Cox and Morgan Schediwy, and Christopher Cox (“Plaintiffs”), oppose the motion at dockets 163, 164, 168, and 169. WCMA’s reply is filed at docket 176. Oral argument was not requested and would not assist the court.
II. BACKGROUND
This action arises out of the death of April Cox, who strangled in the inner cord of a window blind at her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Kotzebue v. McLeanAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Prince v. Parachutes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Mulvihill v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Padilla v. Hunter Douglas Window Coverings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014