Legal Opinion
Shaw v. Shaw
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 17, 2005No. 04 Civ. 7224(LAK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Stuart Shaw (“Stuart”) to dismiss the complaint.
Facts
The Alleged Scheme
The allegations of the complaint are assumed true for purposes of this motion. 1
Margaret Shaw had four children: plaintiff David Shaw (“David”), Stuart, Denise Schure (“Denise”) and Peter Shaw. 2 She was the sole owner of, and resided in, an apartment building located on East 67th Street. Stuart, an attorney, also resided in the" building.
Mrs. Shaw was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease in the early 1970’s. By the early…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Cobble Hill Nursing Home, Inc. v. Henry & Warren Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Sabo v. DelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- 166 Mamaroneck Ave. Corp. v. 151 East Post Road Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Heyman Cohen & Sons, Inc. v. M. Lurie Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fero v. Excellus Health Plain, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- John C. Tatum III v. Fairstead Affordable LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2023