Coca-Cola Co. v. Coble
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
By its first five assignments of error, defendant contends that the trial judge erred in ordering that plaintiff is entitled *128to recover any refund for taxes paid by its purchase of taxpaid lids.
Generally, one who voluntarily pays a tax imposed by an unconstitutional law, and does not know that the law is unconstitutional, may not subsequently recover the tax paid. 84 C.J.S., Taxation, § 687, p. 1284; 72 Am. Jur. 2d, State and Local Taxation, § 1087, p. 349. See also Annots., 74 A.L.R. 1301 (1931), 48 A.L.R. 1381 (1927), and cases cited therein. Where payment of the tax is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Schlesinger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Commercial National Bank v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Tyler v. Dane CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1923
- Manufacturer's Casualty Ins. Co. v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Fairmont v. Pitrolo Pontiac-Cadillac Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Fairmont v. Pitrolo Pontiac-Cadillac Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983