Legal Opinion

Robinson Township v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 2014PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge PELLEGRINI.

This matter is presently before us on remand from a Supreme Court “mandate” directing us to consider the constitutionality of certain provisions of Act 131 to address several claims that we did not address because we incorrectly found that the person(s) asserting the right did not have standing or that the claim could not be brought in a petition for review in our original jurisdiction. See Robinson Township v. Commonwealth, — Pa. -, 83 A.3d 901, 999-1000 (2013) (Robinson Township II ).2 While the Supreme Court affirmed our holding that 58 Pa.C.S. *1109§§…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Saulsbury v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. Council of OakmontSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. In Re: Condemnation by Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. ~ Appeal of: C.S. Katz, Jr. and K.M. KatzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Pennsylvania General Energy Co. v. Grant TownshipDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. In Re: Condemnation by Sunoco Pipeline L.P.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. In Re: Condemnation by Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. ~ Appeal of: C.S. Katz, Jr. and K.M. KatzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API