Legal Opinion

Harbin v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 31, 1924No. 6 Div. 76PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMilder, J.

The defendant was charged with and convicted of the offense of having in his possession spirituous liquors, contrary to law. The charge was framed under subdivision 2 of section 2 of an act in General Acts 1919, p. 7, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:

“That it shall be unlawful * * * for * * * any other person * * * to * * * have in possession or possess in this state, any of said prohibited liquors and beverages * * * in any quantity whatsoever.”

This is the second appearance of this case in this court by certiorari from the Court of Appeals from this conviction, judgment, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Lakey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Harbin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Donahay v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Bosarge v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Powe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Honeycutt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API