Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Hulscher
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 1, 2008No. 35157-9-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
180 P.3d 199 (2008)
In re MARRIAGE OF Martin HULSCHER, Respondent, and
Janice Hulscher, Appellant.
No. 35157-9-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
April 1, 2008.
Fred Michael Misner, Attorney at Law, University Place, WA, for Appellant.
Diana Lynn Kiesel, Attorney at Law, Carol J. Cooper, Davies Pearson PC, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.
BRIDGEWATER, J.
¶ 1 Janice Hulscher appeals from the trial court's order modifying her spousal support award, arguing the spousal support provision is nonmodifiable by its terms. When parties include a nonmodifiable spousal maintenance provision in a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Falcon Insurance Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re the Marriage of ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re the Marriage of YearoutCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- In re the Marriage of SpreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Marriage of LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- In Re The Marriage Of: Gabriel Y. Lee v. Carol Ann KennardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- In Re The Marriage Of: Gabriel Y. Lee v. Carol Ann KennardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- In Re The Marriage Of: Saeed Kaley v. Nancy KaleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In re the Marriage of: Roger L. Aldrich & Mary Beth AldrichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018