Legal Opinion

Carney v. Aicklen

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1980No. B-8961Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

2Per curiam

On March 19, 1980, we refused Jean J. Carney’s application for writ of error, no reversible error. Carney has now filed a motion for rehearing complaining of that action.

The court of civil appeals did not err in affirming the judgment of the probate court that appointed Elma Aicklen as guardian of the person and estate of Elma H. Loud. 587 S.W.2d 507. We cannot determine from the record before us the correctness of the lower court’s holding that the attorney’s fees incurred by Aicklen, which had been approved in an annual account, were…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rowe v. DyessTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. Drake v. Muse, Currie & KohenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Muse, Currie and Kohen v. DrakeTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Legler v. LeglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. Carney v. AicklenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API