Legal Opinion

Muse, Currie and Kohen v. Drake

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1976No. B-5736PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes to us from the Probate Court of Dallas County, where Elizabeth Holt, as the administratrix of the estate of Eugene Dixon Duncan, made application for authorization to pay certain expenses incurred by her from funds of the estate. The probate court approved the claim, but the Court of Civil Appeals has reversed. 532 S.W.2d 369. We agree with the result reached by the court below and therefore refuse petitioner’s application for writ of error, no reversible error. Because we disagree with certain statements made by the Court of Civil Appeals, we deem it appropriate to express…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Logan v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Pena Y Vidaurri's Estate v. BruniCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Drake v. Muse, Currie & KohenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Barney v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Holt v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Laird Palmer v. Garson C. Jackson, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas in Its Statutory Role Pursuant to the State Bar Act of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Drake v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Currie v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Cunningham v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Estate of York, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API