Legal Opinion

Clinchfield Railroad v. Lynch

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided November 27, 1981No. 81-229-CIV-5PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

DUPREE, Chief Judge.

Railroads operating in North Carolina, like their counterparts around the nation, have long been victims of discrimination in the assessment of local property taxes. After nearly two decades of debate Congress in 1976 enacted a statute intended to assist railroads in their efforts to alleviate this discrimination. 1 Section 306, Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (“the 4-R Act”), now codified at 49 U.S.C. § 11503. 2

By this action the railroads which operate within North Carolina seek to employ Section 306 to remedy the property…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal of AMP Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. In Re Appeal of McElweeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Ogilvie v. State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Tennessee v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1979
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Louisiana Tax CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Trailer Train Company, a Corporation and Railbox Company, a Corporation v. State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. American Airlines, Inc. v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Southern Railway Company, Cross-Appellees, United States of America v. State Board of Equalization, Etc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Clinchfield Railroad Company Durham & Southern Railway Company Highpoint, Thomasville & Denton Railroad Company Norfolk, Franklin & Danville Railway Company Norfolk Southern Railway Company Norfolk & Western Railway Company Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company Southern Railway Company and Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Company v. Mark G. Lynch, Secretary of Revenue of the State of North Carolina and Douglas R. Holbrook, Director, Ad Valorem Tax Division of the North Carolina Department of Revenue Iredell County Robeson County Rowan County Rutherford County Vance County Granville County Wilson County, and Mecklenburg County Catawba County Durham County Person County Forsyth County Surry County Union County Johnson County Anson County Harnett County Wake County Madison County Cabarrus County Stokes County Alamance County Columbus County and Halifax County, Clinchfield Railroad Company Durham & Southern Railway Company Highpoint, Thomasville & Denton Railroad Company Norfolk, Franklin & Danville Railway Company Norfolk Southern Railway Company Norfolk & Western Railway Company Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company Southern Railway Company and Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Company v. Catawba County Forsyth County, and Mark G. Lynch, Secretary of Revenue of the State of North Carolina and Douglas R. Holbrook, Director, Ad Valorem Tax Division of the North Carolina Department of Revenue Iredell County Robeson County Rowan County Rutherford County Vance County Granville County Wilson County Mecklenburg County Durham County Person County Surry County Union County Johnson County Anson County Harnett County Wake County Madison County Cabarrus County Stokes County Alamance County Columbus County and Halifax CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Acf Industries, Incorporated v. The State of Arizona and Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API