Legal Opinion

Polaris PowerLED Technologies LLC v. Nintendo Co Ltd

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided August 24, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00386Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 POLARIS POWERLED CASE NO. C22-0386JLR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 11 ORDER Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 NINTENDO CO., LTD., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Plaintiff Polaris PowerLED Technologies, LLC’s (“Polaris”) 17 motion to dismiss Defendants Nintendo Co., Ltd. and Nintendo of America, Inc.’s 18 (collectively, “Nintendo”) counterclaims and strike paragraphs 6-10, 21-46, and 49-51 19 from the counterclaim section of Nintendo’s answer. (Mot. (Dkt. # 39); Reply (Dkt. 20 # 43).) Nintendo…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API