Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Fullerton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 25, 1926PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Thomas—

Affirming.

The appellee, Fullerton, at the regular November election in 1921 was elected prosecuting attorney for tbe city of Ashland, which was then a city of the third class and he qualified and took charge of the office on the first Monday in January, 1922, for a term of four years, which would expire the first Monday in January, 1926. At the time of his election to and entering upon the duties of that office, section 3373 of Carroll’s edition o’f Kentucky Statutes was then in force as a part of the charter of cities of the class referred to, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Jernigan v. City of MadisonvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  3. Gilbert v. City of PaducahCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Henderson County v. Henderson Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pen-Ken Gas & Oil Corp. v. Warfield Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  2. Potts v. PottsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. City of Lexington v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Dummit v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  5. McCray v. City of Lake LouisvillaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API