Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Lemann

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided February 27, 1996No. 2:95CV89-B-OPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BIGGERS, District Judge.

This cause is presently before the court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Upon due consideration of the motion, the pro se plaintiffs response thereto, the affidavits and the memoranda submitted by the parties, the court is prepared to rule.

This is the plaintiffs second attempt to sue the author and publisher of The Promised Land: The Great Black Migration and Haw It Changed America (“The Promised Land”). The defendant Nicholas Lemann wrote the book and it was published by Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. (“Knopf’). The book recounts the Twentieth…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Corley v. Entergy Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
  2. Haynes v. LemannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Madhavan Pisharodi, M.D. v. Alejandro J. Betancourt, M.D., Miguel Cintron, M.D., Giovanni Ghafoori, M.D., Christopher Hansen, M.D., and Eric Six, M.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API