Legal Opinion

Fairfield v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1906No. Civ. No. 158PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.

The plaintiff herein seeks to recover damages from the defendant for a breach of its contract as a common carrier to transport certain merchandise from San Francisco to Nome and there deliver it to him.' At the close of the plaintiff’s case the court granted a nonsuit on the motion of the defendant, and from the judgment thereon the plaintiff has appealed.

The contract upon which the' plaintiff relies for his recovery is the bill of lading issued by the defendant, in which it acknowledges that it has received “to be forwarded per steamer ‘Pueblo’ thé articles or property enumerated hereon, to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé R.R.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Solari v. ShowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. AJ Tebbe & Sons Company v. Brown ExpressTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. AJ Tebbe & Sons Company v. Brown ExpressTexas Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API