Legal Opinion

Nebgen v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided March 29, 1995No. 04-94-00187-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICKHOFF, Justice.

This is a products liability case. Appellants, Tina and Alton Nebgen, appeal a summary judgment rendered in favor of appellee, 3M Company a/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M). The Neb-gens sought to recover damages for personal injuries on theories of negligence, strict products liability, and breach of warranty. *365The trial court granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment “in all things.” The dis-positive issue in this appeal is whether 3M’s summary judgment proof was legally sufficient to negate all of appellants’ claims. We conclude that it was, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Gaulding v. Celotex Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Yates v. FisherTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Neimes v. Kien Chung Ta, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  3. Garcia v. National Eligibility Express, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  4. Mascarenas v. Miles, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
  5. Cedric A. Harris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API