Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Snider v. Seung Lee

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 6, 2009No. 08-1414Published

1Concurring in the judgmentStamp, Senior District Judge

I concur in the result reached by the majority opinion holding that Agent Lee is entitled to qualified immunity and reversing and remanding for dismissal of Snider’s claims of malicious prosecution against Agent Lee. Because I would come to this result through a somewhat different approach, I respectfully write separately.

To prevail on a Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must show that: (1) the defendant initiated or maintained a criminal proceeding; (2) the criminal proceeding terminated in the plaintiffs favor; (3) the proceeding was not supported by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Larry Jerome Brooks v. City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina M.N. Barker, Individually and as a City Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  2. Murphy v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Kossler v. CrisantiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Jeffrey Reed v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, John Griffin, Detective, W. Murphy, DetectiveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Lambert v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API