Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 6, 1954No. 5-521PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Eose Smith, J.

This is a bill in equity by which- the' appellant, W. B. Ferguson, seeks to cancel a warranty deed which he executed and delivered to one of the appellees, Mrs. C. H. Haynes, in 1939. The deed in question conveyed, an undivided interest in . certain minerals to Mrs. Haynes for life, with remainder to her six .children, who . are also appellees. The chancellor held that the- plaintiff’s proof was not .sufficiently clear and convincing to warrant cancellation of the instrument.

Ferguson and Mrs. Haynes are half cousins and were on friendly terms in 1939. According' to Mrs. Haynes, Ferguson came…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. PattonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  2. Phipps-Reynolds Co. v. McIlroy Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Lindsey v. ChristianSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. Hughes v. CoffeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cannon v. OwensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Barker v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Cuzick v. LeslyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Washington v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Parkey v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API