Legal Opinion

Heckman v. Custer County

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1924No. 5,487PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

As employed herein, “assessed value” means the value fixed upon taxable property by the county assessor and equalized by the county and state boards of equalization. “Taxable value” means that percentage of the assessed value which is made the basis of computation of taxes by sections 1999 and 2000, Revised Codes of 1921.

In round numbers the assessed value of all property in Custer county is $28,000,000, the taxable value thereof is $9,250,-000, and the outstanding bonded indebtedness of the county is $615,000.

■This action was instituted by a resident taxpayer of the county to restrain the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hilger v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hersey v. NeilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Evans v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. In re PomeroyMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Lanigan v. Town of GallupNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Great Northern Utilities Co. v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Lewis v. Petroleum CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Henderson v. Dawson CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Johnson v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. WeirMontana Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API