Legal Opinion
Ruffin v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 17, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-2341Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NALENE RUFFIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 22-2341 (JEB) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Nalene Ruffin, Irene Jordan, Demetria Harris, and Darlene Mungin are all current or former employees of the District of Columbia Department of Public Works. Together, they bring a litany of claims against the District, alleging discrimination by their employer on the basis of race, age, and sex. According to them, supervisors at DPW engaged in a coordinated effort to remove middle-aged Black women…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.