Legal Opinion

Filson v. Bell Tel. Labs., Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 26, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

77 N.J. Super. 320 (1962)

186 A.2d 320

MITZI FILSON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES INCORPORATED, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Union County Court, Law Division.

Decided November 26, 1962.

Mr. Aaron Gordon argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Hirschberg, Nashel, Zorn & Cronson, attorneys, Mr. Louis L. Cronson on the brief).

Mr. W. Clark Gaw argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys).

WOOD, WM. FILLMORE, J.C.C.

This case comes before the court on appeal from the determination of the Division of Workmen's…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mazzuchelli v. SilberbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Gotkin v. WeinbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. Sala v. American Sumatra Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
  4. Van Ness v. Borough of HaledonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  5. Green v. Bell CleanersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Filson v. Bell Tel. Labs., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. Jack Coates Field Service Company v. DuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Jack Coates Field Service Company v. DuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API