Legal Opinion
Trend South, Inc. v. Antomarchy
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 31, 1993No. 93-944PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
623 So.2d 815 (1993)
TREND SOUTH, INC., a Florida corporation, d/b/a Sugar's, and Richard Glatzer, M.D., Petitioners,
v.
Niurys ANTOMARCHY, Respondent.
No. 93-944.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
August 31, 1993.
Parenti, Falk, Waas & Frazier and Gail Leverett, Miami, for petitioners.
Brumer, Cohen, Logan, Kandell & Kaufman and Cynthia Barnett Hibnick, Miami, for respondent.
Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.
2Per curiam
The petitioners, Trend South, Inc., d/b/a Sugar's [Trend South] and Richard Glatzer, M.D., seek review by petition for writ of common law certiorari of the trial…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Lichtor v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- McAdoo v. OgdenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Crandall v. MichaudDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Wood v. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Cooper v. SchoffstallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Syken v. ElkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- LeJeune v. AikinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Cooper v. SchoffstallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006