Legal Opinion
CALE v. KEIM LUMBER COMPANY
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 8, 2024No. 2:20-cv-01763Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NATHANIEL W. CALE, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 20-1763 v. ) ) KEIM LUMBER COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Presently before the Court is Defendant Keim Lumber Company’s (“Keim Lumber”) Motion for Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff Nathaniel W. Cale. (Docket No. 112). The Court has considered the motion, Keim Lumber’s brief in support thereof (Docket No. 117), Keim Lumber’s Concise Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (Docket No. 116), Plaintiff Nathaniel W. Cale’s (“Cale”) Concise Statement of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.