Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 1, 1991No. 01-90-00443-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILSON, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, found two enhancement paragraphs true, and assessed punishment at 25 years confinement. We reverse for the State’s failure to observe fundamental principles of appropriate jury argument.

Appellant raises no complaint as to evidence adduced against him at trial. A long narrative about the evidence is therefore unnecessary. Jorge Garcia testified he owned a 1982 white, four-door Buick LaSa-bre automobile. He arose one morning to find the car missing from his driveway where he had parked and locked it the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Motilla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Kacz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  3. Lasher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  5. Lasher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API