Legal Opinion

Lund v. Cox

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an appeal by the respondent from “the decision” of the Land Court whereby it ordered “a decree” for the registration of the petitioner’s land “free of encumbrances claimed by the respondent.”

The respondent did not allege in her answer that she owned a fee in any part of the locus: she alleged therein that under two deeds in priority to that of the petitioner’s predecessor in title, she acquired bathhouse and bathing privileges; that a road or way extended over the common grantor’s land with its termini at Ipswich Bay and she acquired the privilege of erecting and keeping a bathhouse…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Dubinsky v. CamaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. City of Boston v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Holmes v. BarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Les v. AlibozekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Barney & Carey Co. v. Town of MiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Anderson v. DeVriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Myers v. SalinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. Hewitt v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Lasell College v. LeonardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API