Legal Opinion

People v. Arnold

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2004No. S106444PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

In this case we interpret the scope and effect of a defendant’s waiver of custody credits—commonly referred to as a “Johnson waiver” (People v. Johnson (1978) 82 Cal.App.3d 183 [147 Cal.Rptr. 55] (Johnson)— which enables a sentencing court to reinstate a defendant on probation after *298he or she has violated probation, conditioned on service of an additional county jail term, as an alternative to imposing a state prison sentence. We conclude that when a defendant knowingly and intelligently waives jail time custody credits after violating probation in order to be reinstated on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cowan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. BrunerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. UrkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Enos v. HolderDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
  4. People v. JeffreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API