People v. Arnold
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
In this case we interpret the scope and effect of a defendant’s waiver of custody credits—commonly referred to as a “Johnson waiver” (People v. Johnson (1978) 82 Cal.App.3d 183 [147 Cal.Rptr. 55] (Johnson)— which enables a sentencing court to reinstate a defendant on probation after *298he or she has violated probation, conditioned on service of an additional county jail term, as an alternative to imposing a state prison sentence. We conclude that when a defendant knowingly and intelligently waives jail time custody credits after violating probation in order to be reinstated on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Cowan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. BrunerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. UrkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Enos v. HolderDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- People v. JeffreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.