Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. School District No. 1
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court, lion. James H. Teller, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
This was an action brought by the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company to recover a portion of the “Special School Tax,” paid by the' company under protest to the treasurer of Yuma County. The school board of the defendant, School District No. 1, certified to the board of county commissioners of Yuma County a twenty mill levy, the board made the same, and the assessor used the levy in extending taxes against the property of the plaintiff railroad company.
The levy was certified and made under chapter 206 of the Session Laws of 1911, being an act entitled “An Act to amend Section Five…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Twin City Bank v. NebekerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Northern Counties Trust v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Farmers Independent Ditch Co. v. Agricultural Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- City of Denver v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lujan v. Colorado State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- People v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- Mikell v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- People ex rel. Park Reservoir Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- Allardice v. Adams CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.