Armour Rentals, Inc. v. General State Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Opinion bx
Judge Kramer
(Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part) :
I concur with the majority that the Preliminary Objections to the counts of the Complaint in Assumpsit should be sustained; but I respectfully dissent from the majority’s sustaining the Preliminary Objections to the counts of the Complaint in Trespass.
The General State Authority (GSA) was patently organized as a means to circumvent former constitu*532tional limitations on governmental indebtedness. GSA over the years of its existence (since its creation in 1935), has competitively engaged in the business of land and building…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Morris v. Mount Lebanon Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971