Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Armour Rentals, Inc. v. General State Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1972No. Nos. 58 C.D. 1971 and 59 C.D. 1971Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Opinion bx

Judge Kramer

(Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part) :

I concur with the majority that the Preliminary Objections to the counts of the Complaint in Assumpsit should be sustained; but I respectfully dissent from the majority’s sustaining the Preliminary Objections to the counts of the Complaint in Trespass.

The General State Authority (GSA) was patently organized as a means to circumvent former constitu*532tional limitations on governmental indebtedness. GSA over the years of its existence (since its creation in 1935), has competitively engaged in the business of land and building…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Morris v. Mount Lebanon Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API