Legal Opinion

Tunstall v. C. E. Carlton & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1933No. 9825Published

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

These findings of fact and law filed by the learned trial court sufficiently disclose not only the nature and result of the suit below but also the grounds upon which the judgment there was based; the record fails to show that any of the fact-findings were ever excepted to in such way as to permit the plaintiffs in error to question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain any of them, as so stated; they are therefore binding as such upon 'this court, and, together with the appended conclusions of law, are in full as follows:

“Court’s Findings of Fact.
“1. I find that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cullers v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Crowder Sr. v. Union Nat. BankTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Vaden v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Wilkerson & Satterfield v. McMurryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Pearson v. FelpsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API