State v. . Roberson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, J., dissenting; HOKE, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. The prisoner was convicted of the capital felony, and from the judgment of the court appealed.
The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court. 1. The most important contention made by the prisoner upon this appeal is that there is no evidence of a premeditated and deliberate homicide.
The prisoner having admitted that he slew the deceased with a pistol, the law presumes malice, but nevertheless places the burden on the State to fully satisfy the jury that it was deliberately and premeditatedly done to justify a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- State v. . BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State v. Teachey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. . BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. . EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- State v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . WiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975