Legal Opinion

Estate of Strong

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1937No. L. A. 15933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Strong, as executrix of the last will and testament of Alice B. Strong, deceased, filed her second account and petition for distribution of the entire estate of the decedent with the exception of sufficient funds to pay-balances due on account of inheritance and estate taxes, attorneys’ fees, and commissions. The court entered its decree of final distribution. This decree provided that Alice L. Lacey, one of the legatees, should be reimbursed for the inheritance tax of $103.71 on the contingent remainder devised to her, which amount had been deducted by the executrix from her cash legacy. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. BabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Estate of McLaughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Murphy v. O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Gracey v. City of MercedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Burling v. ThompkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Schram v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. Estate of HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Estate of KannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Long v. McJimseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API