Legal Opinion

Dyer v. James Black Masonry & Contracting Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1916No. Docket No. 82PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Certiorari to the Industrial Accident Board. Sid Dyer presented his claim for compensation against the James Black Masonry & Contracting Company for personal injuries while in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

This case is before us upon certiorari to the Industrial Accident Board; the case in its progress having regularly reached the board, which granted compensation to the claimant, from which order the respondent appeals.

Claimant was injured December 10, 1914, at the David Stott Building, in Detroit. He and his partner, John Ross, were at the time of the accident engaged in doing the glazing on the building in question under the following written contract with the principal contractor:

“Detroit, Michigan, Nov. 19, 1914.
“Sidney Dyer & John Ross,
“City.
“Gentlemen:
“We hereby accept your proposition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gaynor's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Thompson v. TwissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Sabella v. BrazileiroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  4. Cheevers's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Howard's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wooddale, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. Bettman v. ChristenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Herbig v. Walton Auto Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. State Accident Fund v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  5. Pallanck v. DonovanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API