Legal Opinion

Sabella v. Brazileiro

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 1, 1914PublishedCited by 19 opinions

On certiorari to the Hudson Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bergen; J.

This cause was submitted on such briefs as should be filed within the time prescribed by the rules of this court, and we have not been favored with any on behalf of the defendant in certiorari. A paper was filed by a person who claims to be an attorney-at-law, but he appears to be ignorant of the rule observed in this court, that only those who have been admitted as counselors of this court are permitted to appear and argue causes before it. A brief filed in this court *506by one who has not been admitted to the degree of counselor-at-iaw will…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Thompson v. TwissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Daggett v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State ex rel. City of Northfield v. District Court of Rice CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Gomez v. Federal Stevedoring Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API