Legal Opinion

WAYCROSS COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY v. Hiott

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1977No. 53430PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Judge.

Following an award of workmen’s compensation and a supplemental agreement that claimant had reached maximum recovery, claimant applied for a lump-sum award inasmuch as his doctor advised that he would never be able to do physical or manual labor and with the funds received as a lump sum he might enter some other type of endeavor to become partially productive.

A hearing was held by the board to determine the need for a lump sum to be awarded under Code Ann. § 114-417 (Ga. L. 1937, pp. 230, 233; 1937, pp. 528, 531; 1943, pp. 167-169; 1963, pp. 141, 151), and the board authorized…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. HollifieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hensel Phelps Construction Co. v. ManigaultCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Rite Aid Corp. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Rite Aid Corp. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API