Legal Opinion
Raitport v. Commercial Banks Loc. Within This Dist.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1975No. 75 Civ. 66 (HFW)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
WERKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, pro se, brings this antitrust treble damage action against a purported class of all commercial banks in this district and all foundations operating investment portfolios managed by these banks. First National City Bank (“Citibank”) is named as the representative party of the class of defendant banks and foundations. Prior to answering the complaint, Citibank has moved for summary judgment upon the grounds of res judicata based on the opinion of Judge Knapp in Raitport v. Chase Manhattan Capital Corp., et al., 388 F.Supp. 1095…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Huron Holding Corp. v. Lincoln Mine Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cahill v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Raitport v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Morgan Consultants v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Ward v. Arkansas State PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1980
- Mercer v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.