Legal Opinion

Saunders v. State Farm Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 1982No. 2940PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

The sole issue for our determination in this case may be stated as follows: Where an insured has received reimbursement for all of his medical expenses and lost earnings under the personal injury protection coverage contained in his no-fault insurance policy, may an arbitrator also make an award for the same medical expenses and lost earnings in addition to an award for pain and suffering as part of the insured’s recovery under the uninsured motorist coverage?

In this case the appellee, Barbara Saunders, was insured by the appellant, State Farm Insurance Company. The policy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Robert F. Felte, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. CasperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rossi v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. West American Insurance v. OberdingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Drusak v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Steppling v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Steppling v. PENN. MFRS. ASS'N INS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API