Legal Opinion

Krug v. Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 19, 1918PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Two appeals from Circuit. Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. (Ambler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The causes were argued together before Briscoe, Thomas, Pattison, Urner, Stockbridge and Constable, JJ.

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

This, is a special case stated under the 47th Equity Rule, Code, Art. 16, sec. 206, and is an amicable controversy between a beneficiary for life, and remaindermen, for the purpose of determining whether or not a distribution of shares of stock of the Merchants and Miners Transportation Company (to he hereafter called the Transportation Company) constitute income or corpus of a trust estate.

The facts are undisputed and are set out in an agreed statement in the record and all of the parties in interest are sui juris.

The testator under whose will the trust was created died on the 4th of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. DanaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  2. Thomas v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  3. Smith v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  4. Coudon v. UpdegrafCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  5. Hemenway v. HemenwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hudson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  2. Baldwin v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  3. Rosenburg v. LombardiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. Central Hanover Bank, C., Co. v. BramanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  5. Spedden v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API