The L. R. Connett No. 17
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
We find no reason to upset the findings of fact of the District Judge as to what happened on the night in question. While it seems indeed somewhat strange that the tide without the aid of any northwest wind should have swept the floats along the Brooklyn shore, nothing makes it impossible, and the issue was one on which the findings below should certainly prevail. Also as to the seamanship of the tug masters, the testimony being again conflicting, we are not disposed to intervene. The situation called for immediate action, and, if the tug masters did not choose the best course, it was at…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Sinram v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Cherokee-Seminole S. S. Corp. v. Kingan Provision Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- The AlgonquinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1933