Legal Opinion

Vickery v. Barnhart

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 31, 1941No. 4425; No. 4426PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeNeoot, Judge

These are appeals in an interference proceeding wherein the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirmed a decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention of the subject matter of counts 1, 4, and 6 to the party Barnhart, and of the subject matter of counts 2, 3,5, and 7 to the party Vickery. Barn-hart appeals from so much of the decision of the board as relates to counts 2, 3, 5, and 7, and Vickery appeals from so much of said decision as relates to counts 1,4, and 6.

The interference arises between a patent, No. 2,050,554, issued to Barnhart on August…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Foxboro Co. v. Taylor Instrument CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. In Re LobdellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  5. Meitzner v. MindickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API