Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Kirkwood

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Multnomah.: Frank M. Calkins, Judge. This is an action by J. W. Farrell against R. J. Kirkwood to recover the amount due upon two promissory notes. From a judgment for the defendant, plaintiff appeals. The facts are set forth in the opinion of the court. Department 2.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNary

Failing to meet the demand for the payment of two promissory notes, one for $719.81, the other for $64.90, plaintiff brings this action to recover of defendant two separate judgments. The complaint embraces the conventional allegations. The notes were executed and delivered by defendant to the Columbia Life & Trust Company, and by it indorsed to plaintiff. Defendant admits the execution of the notes, but alleges as a separate defense that for a number of years he was employed by the Columbia Life & Trust Company in the capacity of special' agent, soliciting and writing insurance policies for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Balfour v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hughey v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Gaston v. McLeranMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 1872

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blue River Sawmills, Ltd. v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Landolt v. Flame, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Fones v. MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Lorber v. MarshallOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Dryden v. DalyOregon Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API