State v. Kent
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HYDE, Judge.
Defendant, charged under the Habitual Criminal Act (Sec. 556.280), was convicted of possession of a narcotic drug and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. Sec. 195.020. (Statutory references are to RSMo and V.A.M.S.) Defendant has appealed but has filed no brief so we consider all grounds stated in his motion for new trial, made in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 27.20, V.A.M.R., which serve as assignments of error on appeal. (See also Rule 28.02.)
Defendant contends the evidence was not sufficient to make a submissible case or to sustain a conviction for the offense charged.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. ReaganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State v. CusumanoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- State v. HutchinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- State v. ReederSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- State v. TrevinoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- State v. KentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.