Legal Opinion
Elhady v. Kable
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided September 4, 2019No. Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-375 (AJT/JFA)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Anthony J. Trenga, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs are twenty-three United States citizens1 who claim that because of *567their inclusion in the federal government's Terrorist Screening Database ("TSDB"), referred to colloquially as "the Watchlist," they have suffered a range of adverse consequences without a constitutionally adequate remedy.2
In Mohamed v. Holder , 2015 WL 4394958 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2015), the Court concluded that the Department of Homeland Security Traveler Redress Inquiry Program ("DHS TRIP"), as that process existed at the time, did not provide a constitutionally…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Abdi v. WrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable, IVCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Abu Irshaid v. GarlandDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- Dimick v. GarlandDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- Jardaneh v. BarrDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.