Legal Opinion
Seabolt v. Christian
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 21, 1950No. 33122PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
“Where there is no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced, with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict, the court may direct the jury to find for the party entitled thereto.” Code § 110-104. Where there are no material issues of fact, it is proper for the trial judge to direct a verdict in favor of the party entitled thereto under the evidence submitted. Lott-Lewis Co. v. Bingham-Hewett Grain Co., 28 Ga. App. 728 (113 S. E. 222). The mere fact that there are conflicts in the testimony does not render the direction of the verdict erroneous,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blue v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Graham v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Pope v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Stanfield v. McConnon & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Dorris v. Farmers & Merchants BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- HOMASOTE COMPANY v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Hutson v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Cooley v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- SMALLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
- Chavers v. Kent Diversified Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.