Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kapusta v. De Puy Manufacturing Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1967No. 20,619Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION.

Faulconer, J.

I would sustain appellee’s motion to dismiss or affirm on the ground that the transcript and assignment of errors was not filed in this court within 90 days of the entry of summary judgment. I am of the opinion that the granting of a summary judgment as authorized by Acts 1965, ch. 90, § 1, p. 126, § 2-2524, Burns’ 1966 Cum. Supp., is not a trial and, therefore, the filing of a motion for new trial is a nullity and does not extend the time for appeal.

*486Although this is a new question in this State, there is a statute and several decisions of our Supreme Court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Parmelee v. Chicago Eye Shield Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  2. Fisk v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Joseph, Pierce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Otteman v. Interstate Fire and Casualty CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API