Legal Opinion
Taliaferro v. Farkas
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 8, 1932No. 22215PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. Where the defendant in a trover action executes a replevy bond for the property, it is the general rule that “the bail or security takes the fortunes of his principal, and is bound equally with him by the judgment in the main action. No suit on the bond is necessary. The bail can no more go behind the judgment or attack it, by affidavit of illegality, after it is duly entered up against both, than can the principal.” Jackson v. Guilmartin, 61 Ga. 544, 545; Roberts v. Crosby, 43 Ga. App. 267, 268 (158 S. E. 444); Holmes v. Langston, 110 Ga. 861 (3) (36 S. E. 251); Connally v. Morris, 29 Ga.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holmes v. Langston & WoodsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Waldrop v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Jackson v. Guilmartin & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Fitzgerald Granitoid Co. v. Alpha Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Morse v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Houston General Insurance v. Stein Steel & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Pickett v. Chamblee Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Ford v. EskridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- O'Leary v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Ford v. HerbermannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971